As Operation Sindoor unfolded, it wasn’t just military strategy or tactical advances on the line—an equally aggressive war erupted in the digital space. Within hours of the operation’s launch, misinformation and disinformation campaigns flooded online platforms, creating confusion, panic, and false narratives. In just 48 hours, a barrage of misleading content emerged, underscoring the urgent need for a coordinated response on the information front.
The digital battlefield saw social media activists working overtime to debunk false claims, including a viral post that claimed the Indian Air Force had lost five fighter jets—an outright fabrication. While the efforts of these truth-seekers were commendable, the burden of upholding factual integrity should not rest on individuals alone.
Fortunately, India’s Press Information Bureau (PIB) stepped in. Its Fact Check team quickly identified and refuted a series of fictitious stories originating from across the border. These included bogus reports of a drone strike in Jalandhar, the alleged destruction of a non-existent Indian military post dubbed “20 Raj Battalion,” and a fabricated letter supposedly signed by the Chief of Army Staff. In total, the PIB debunked at least seven major false narratives in one day. Despite these official clarifications, some of the fake stories still gained traction—going viral and sowing fear as intended.
Even more concerning is the role some Indian media outlets and influencers played in this chaos. Rather than correcting misinformation, a few television networks and social media figures amplified it. One major news channel even ran dramatic, fictional reports about attacks on Pakistani cities, complete with speculative expert panels and sensational headlines. This descent into infotainment over journalism poses a real threat to public trust and national unity.
The Modi government has taken steps like blocking questionable websites and flagging dubious content, but more robust action is necessary. When the truth is under siege, reactive measures won’t suffice. Proactive communication—including frequent, transparent official briefings—must become standard protocol during crises.
Experts distinguish clearly between misinformation—errors made in good faith and later corrected—and disinformation, which blends fact with fiction to manipulate opinion. Propaganda, the most dangerous form of disinformation, is used to provoke, divide, or push political agendas, and in wartime, even legitimate news sources may fall into the trap of nationalism over accountability.
In such a climate, it is vital that both government and media institutions stay vigilant. Disinformation not only undermines the public’s understanding but can inflame tensions and destabilize society. Combating it requires more than just fact-checking—it demands a renewed commitment to truth, integrity, and responsible communication.
Author: This news is edited by: Abhishek Verma, (Editor, CANON TIMES)
Authentic news.
